diebold_ad_hack.jpgFrom the time voting machines first entered the election process, there have been numerous controversies. The New Hampshire primary is the latest debacle surrounding these easily rigged elections. Several candidate on both sides of the (same) aisle have called for recounts.

1 – one company provided 81% of all the voting machines in New Hampshire. That company is operated by a convicted drug trafficker AND has been convicted of election fraud.

2 – in the townships using hand counted ballots, Barrack Obama won handily, in the townships using these Diebold voting machines, Hillary won handily.

Clinton (voting machine) 91,717 52.95%
Obama (voting machine) 81,495 47.05%

Clinton (Hand-counted) 20,889 47.05%
Obama (Hand-counted) 23,509 52.95%

3 – Ron Paul received 0 votes in dozens of townships with these machines. So far, with two townships checked, voters have been found that voted for him but were never counted. In townships with hand counted ballots, Paul averaged over 15% of the vote.

4 – dozens of townships had large numbers of votes recorded simply as OTHER.

It is clear that these voting machines are easily hacked and in fact, just like the 2000 and 2004 presidential election, HAVE been hacked.

I say OUTLAW VOTING MACHINES and return to hand counting ballots. Sure, there are still ways to game the system, but it is much harder.

The other step that should change is that it should be illegal for media to declare winners of any election until such time as ballots have been counted and certified.

image from no-respect.blogspot.com